In France, the issue of abortion is often portrayed as a triumph of feminism and a step towards equality. However, the historical context of abortion in France is more complex. The feminist movement of the 1960s was led by Happy Motherhood, but it was overshadowed by a male-dominated group known as the Littré group, led by Dr. Pierre Simon. This group pushed for the legalization of abortion and caused internal conflicts within Happy Motherhood.

Since then, French Family Planning has aligned itself with Freemason ideology, viewing abortion as a fundamental freedom that prioritizes individual will over the sanctity of life. This perspective diminishes the role of feminism in the abortion debate and distances it from the original ideals of Happy Motherhood. The legalization of abortion as a constitutional freedom in France reflects a broader shift towards materialism and voluntarism, elevating personal will above moral considerations.

By enshrining abortion as a freedom in the constitution, France has adopted a stance that promotes the idea of abortion as a positive act of self-affirmation rather than a destructive and morally complex decision. This viewpoint, influenced by Freemason ideology, challenges traditional conceptions of human identity and autonomy, prioritizing individual freedom over ethical considerations.

The widespread acceptance of abortion in France reflects a deep cultural shift towards materialism and moral relativism, perpetuated by powerful ideological forces. The entrenched nature of abortion as a constitutional freedom has limited public discourse on the issue, creating a climate of censorship that stifles dissenting voices. Despite this challenging landscape, there is a growing call for compassionate and reality-based discussions on abortion rooted in empathy and truth.

The Catholic Church faces an uphill battle to confront this entrenched cultural norm and advocate for a more nuanced approach to abortion issues. By offering support to pregnant women facing difficult decisions and promoting culture of life and compassion, the Church can play an essential role in fostering empathetic dialogue on these issues in France.

In conclusion, while many see legalized abortion in France as an achievement for women’s rights and equality, its historical context is more complicated than often portrayed. The influence of neo-Malthusian traditions and Freemasonic thought on French Family Planning’s perspective raises questions about individual freedom versus ethical considerations. As such, there is an urgent need for compassionate discussions that take into account both perspectives while prioritizing human dignity above all else.