Presidential Immunity Ruled Upon: Dissenting Justices and Biden Condemn Decision, While Trump Celebrates and Ocasio-Cortez Vows Action
The US Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity has sparked strong reactions, particularly from within the court itself. In a minority opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Katanji Brown Jackson expressed their dissent, calling the decision a threat to democracy and the normal functioning of government. Sotomayor specifically criticized the ruling for granting criminal immunity to presidents, which she argued would allow them to act above the law.
President Biden also condemned the court’s decision, stating that no one, not even the president, is above the law. He criticized the ruling for setting a dangerous precedent that could potentially lead to unrestricted presidential powers. Democrats in Congress, including representatives like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Hakeem Jeffries, pledged to take action against the ruling and proposed measures to strengthen oversight of the Supreme Court.
In contrast, the Republican Party welcomed the court’s decision, with former President Trump hailing it as a victory for democracy and the constitution. The ruling distinguishes between presidential acts that are considered official and those that are not, giving presidents immunity for the former. This distinction will potentially affect Trump’s ongoing legal matters, including cases related to the 2020 election and the stormy Daniels hush money scandal.
Overall, the ruling on presidential immunity has raised significant concerns about the balance of power and accountability in government, with both Democrats and Republicans reacting strongly to
